"The thinking man must oppose all cruel customs no matter how deeply rooted in tradition or surrounded by a halo. We need a boundless ethics which will include the animals also.” -Albert Schweitzer
How to distort and pervert the meaning of a word in the most disgusting way.
This makes my blood boil.
Wow, so this is the definition of being compassionate, eh? Whatever.
Is this a joke or?
This is why I can’t deal with certain vegetarians and vegans. You don’t eat the meat, so don’t fucking look at the labels.
Yes! Let’s just close our eyes and problem solved. Let’s ignore the fact that billions of animals are exploited on a daily basis in every possible way while humans pat themselves on the back for being “compassionate” towards those they exploit. Because this is just a matter of labels and not an oppressive belief system. Maybe we should do the same with every other injustice on earth. Life would be much simpler for our privileged asses.
But you would be happier with no animal slaughter for food, resulting in over breeding and over population of animals. Meaning the animals would then be slaughtered in a cull to prevent over population - animals deaths for nothing.
Um… no. Those animals raised to be slaughtered (and for other purposes) wouldn’t be on this planet if humans didn’t breed them in order to use them. The point is to stop breeding them.
And they’re already dying for nothing.
Anonymous said: I do recognize that meat is an antibiotic laden corpse of an animal. Just like vegetables can be desribed as "decaying, manure-infested blobs of tissue". What's your point?
"Decaying, manure-infested blobs of tissue".
Is that what all the cool kids are calling it these days?
What’s your point?